Variants
Views
Actions

PvXwiki:Admin noticeboard/Resolved General Issues

From PvXwiki
Jump to: ,
Archives

Contents

[] A/any Vaettir Farm

Was moved without an agreement being reached on the talk page. I moved it back until more people get the chance to voice their opinions on the matter. 07:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

You don't need concensus for small changes. It has no critical effect on anything, and I'd already cured all links to the page. The "_HM" bit of the name was a relic of the build name which should never have been there. ALSO you forgot to suppress redirects. 07:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Resolved, build is now at . -- 14:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

[] User Merge?

I don't recall seeing any pages on pvx like - but would you do whatever the procedure is for (new) & (old) 12:53, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Only Requires votes though 12:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

See his talk page. Has literally never been constructive in the slightest, posts flame-worthy crap and defends himself by calling everybody scrubs. -- -

You may want to check, because I've actually been correct in every instance. The AB build was outdated, the ER build sucked and still does the 3rd time around. Actually check your history instead of just assuming. In the case of pvx, the majority is rarely correct, mainly because they're sheep. -- 05:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, you'd be a great judge of your own correctness... Anyway, whether you were right or not is irrelevent here, as you were obviously not contributing to the discussions, but simply using personal attacks (which, by the way, is a bannable offense). If someone (from America) were to go around and say "FUCK JEWS AND MUSLIMS AND HINDIS THEY'RE ALL FAGS!!!11!1!" they might be "right" from a majority standpoint in that they're supporting the religion of the majority, but that doesn't make their opinions any more valid. -- -
Not the place to rant jai...-- 07:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Just one last thing before I stop clogging up the AN: I don't even necessarily have issue with Silven's standpoint on the builds he's "contributed" to, but simply how he goes about flaming trolling arguing stuff. If Silven can prove that most of his comments have actually been constructive (which doesn't include calling people sheep, scrubs, shit, etc.), then I'll eat my words. -- -
Jai was before me, but I too want to say he's highly annoying and is just being a big obstacle 14:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Jai was banned for commenting when he knew to stop (even being warned). Shadow was banned for commenting for no reason. Silven has been warned and I will keep an eye out and decide if further action is needed. 17:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

[] Protected pages, autoban, some help

Hey Phen/Toraen/Fellow admins, I wanted to ask how it is possible I got an autoban (Other bans looked very different) and I get to see no "edit" button, because it says every page is "protected". 19:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

And now it has been fixed now I re-opened Chrome, sorry :S 19:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
autoban is when you're using an IP that is currently banned (and has autoban enabled). 19:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Never had that before though, that message 19:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Is massive, massive, massive drama a bannable offense? Because Minion's made months of it. If you want to ban me for essentially feeding him for so long, I wouldn't put up too much of a fight. -- -

Toraen is already following the discussion afaik. He would have taken action earlier if I had done anything wrong (or be told to stop). ~ 05:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Besides, pvx would be boring if excluded was gone, there'd be no drama to keep us interested! 05:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
This is the last warning any of you will ever get to not discuss stuff on this noticeboard. This is incredibly lenient considering two people were banned in the above section for this very thing. If you absolutely feel the need to comment on something on this noticeboard use the talk page. To clarify, it is inappropriate for Excluded to comment in a section specifically complaining about his behaviour and Roland's comment was one of the most useless I have ever seen on this noticeboard. Don't do it in future. People can consider this a blanket warning, I will simply ban in the future. 10:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Violation of and refusal to self revert . Discussion of which version is appropriate is pending on which version of the page is appropriate, but I have no intention of entering into a revert war. 12:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

I feel a ban is unneeded. Both parties were acting with , and all involved are now discussing the changes (and Ska has been warned by yourself). Unless the reverting continues, there's no need for intervention. 20:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

General NPA & unconstructive edits - All the edits appear to be a logged out user, you can ID him fairly easily with checkuser. And then to top it off, -- 07:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

That is my ip, was having issues logging in, also where's the NPA? When has it been against policy to inform admins of asshattery. I am however guilty of replacing the word "toe" with "penis". 09:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I've warned the user in question. 10:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Hi enormous, once more 19:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Banned. For the record shadow, don't post on his talks or respond to him at all anymore. -- 19:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Obvious sock is v. obvious. Also, his other accounts are probably the other two new ones: and . 22:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

All are blocked for socking. -- 00:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

[] Archived tested GvG builds

When hitting the "next 200" button on I get the url but I stay at the first page.

I assume this might be better off at another place but couldn't find it (curse noticeboard maybe?). So please move if appropriate. 11:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

It's already on curse noticeboard. It affects all categories with >200 members. -- 15:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Curse appear to have resolved this, it was working yesterday too but I forgot to comment. 08:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

[]

Countless NPA and poking at new members when told to stop harassing us by admin. Open racism with no attempt to hide what he thinks of Fianchetto and I and his conduct when rating the past few builds have been suspect to votebalancing. Sorry Toraen; I was already typing this when you banned him. 06:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Resolved, Rask banned for 1 week. -- 06:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

I'd like to make a remark that Herp is making unnecessary edits (under the sign of "Qwak") and does not listen to Phen. 22:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Shadow. Besides my past confrontations with him, he is acting below is intelligence. 22:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Blocked. Dunno what's gotten into everyone lately but seriously chill. -- 22:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

See . Quak aka minion/jerplerp evading ban. 18:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. 19:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

HerpDerp evading his ban. 19:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Not enough evidence for this, and there's no harmful edits from this IP. -- 19:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

See Quak evading ban. 05:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Polar voting. User could do with learning to vote properly. (hey there 0, 1, 5) 12:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't see a specific problem with polar voting. He is at least being consistent, it's not really our job to define what an acceptable spread of votes is. If you wish to discuss this further feel free to hit me up on my talk page. 13:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Weird text and removing things in my sandbox, probably the start of an annoying IP -- 13:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. -- 14:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

and ( · · · · · ). It's an odd couple :S. -- 13:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Same person. Talked to them. 13:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Ban pl0x. 14:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes sir. 14:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Obvious violation -- 16:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Violation of 1RV here: 03:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

And here: --Jai 03:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Axe Tank issue has been resolved. Soi was right about Alex's page though, and I'd advise not doing anything like that in the future. -- 05:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · ) / ( · · · · · )

Putting videos up on all the farming builds to promote his channel, even for builds that already have perfectly adequate vids already, and with videos that are no better than the previous ones. -- -

The only edit after the warnings () was an addition to the existing videos. I'm fine with him adding a video or two to a build as long as he doesn't remove the existing ones with no reason. If they're crappy quality then his videos can be removed, but otherwise ^__^.-- 20:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
His edits are in good faith and his videos are great quality. I've appended his videos if there wasn't a reason to replace currents vids-- 21:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Just check recent ratings, derp. -- -

Sorted. 07:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

"Fianchetto McFaggotFace Cool your tits bro"
22:17, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
While quotes are nice, links to the actual edit are the thing we actually need. (I mean I found it, but the point is if you have an issue you should be linking us to it so we don't have to dig through contributions for it, especially when the page isn't mentioned, it could be anywhere). 00:43, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Just to make sure it's seen (from ): --Jai

Don't post the damn conversation Jai, a link suffices. 15:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

use of tag to violate NPA . i cried. also, he obviously doesn't know what he's talking about, it's a working setup not a troll page. gg. ♟ 18:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Since Soi is Minion's sock, should all of his/its votes be removed? Also, what about Minion's votes? The few votes of Soi that I could find from Recent Ratings, his talk page, and a little searching:

-- -

Apart from markway (oversight I think), Minion/Soi votes don't exist on the same build. 20:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
As long as there isn't a double vote (Soi & Minion on the same build) they can just be left alone. Minion's existing votes remain valid so long as they have proper reasoning. -- 23:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)


[] ( · · · · · )

NPA violation, see 22:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

You're going to post this on AN when swag was reverting your vandalism?-- 23:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Wanding was the only DPS on the build, pretty sure my suggestion increased overall damage by.... 33%? 16:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Violation of 1RV . Has a bad habit of making senseless edits just to make pages conform to his own personal standards. 16:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

User warned. Edit reverted. 07:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Violation of NPA . Not his first time being a dick using edit summaries. 23:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Troll editing/vandalizing the chopway page 23:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

No action required. Vandalism already reverted. 07:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

[] ( · · · · · )

Violation of []. Trying to downplay a build through meaningless wordplay: "The player build is less popular than Esurge/Panic, but the hero build is meta in nearly any hero team." Vs. "The player build typically only sees use in spikes, but the hero build is meta in nearly any hero team.". This is like the fourth time he's done it (recently) and in general his edits are meaningless and serve only to meet his personal standards, not the communities. Also he's autistic with attri spreads. 03:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Banned by Big. Given that this is at least his third 1RV incident (and we let him go with warnings those times) I don't have much of a problem that the ban is longer than usual for 1RV. -- 23:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Fianchetto trashvoted , , and so he could tag the first two for trash and push the latter to Good. As far as I'm concerned, he's purposely undermining the vetting system of the wiki whether or not his votes are valid and can kindly fuck off the wiki permanently. I've already told him to stop before but he's continued to troll shit and fuck with the wiki and most of his contributions haven't been constructive at all. He's made it obvious he no longer wishes to contribute in a positive manner to the wiki. This might be a personal grudge, but doing this crap right after he gets his ban shortened pisses me off.-- 05:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

I removed the vote on DoA Axeway because he is still being ridiculous and his vote on the Turret Ranger was pretty bad, but so was Jake's. I think you are looking at events with blinders on here. He voted on quite a few builds. This may shock you to hear, but his votes may have actually been that these votes are in line with his opinion and not part of some deeper conspiracy. 15:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)