Variants
Views
Actions

PvXwiki:Admin noticeboard/Resolved General Issues

From PvXwiki
<
Revision as of 17:56, 10 April 2012 by Chieftain Alex () ( | )

Jump to: ,
Archives

Contents

A/any Vaettir Farm

Was moved without an agreement being reached on the talk page. I moved it back until more people get the chance to voice their opinions on the matter. ApplesaucePancakes () 07:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

You don't need concensus for small changes. It has no critical effect on anything, and I'd already cured all links to the page. The "_HM" bit of the name was a relic of the build name which should never have been there. ALSO you forgot to suppress redirects. 07:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Resolved, build is now at . -- 14:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

User Merge?

I don't recall seeing any pages on pvx like - but would you do whatever the procedure is for Shadow () (new) & Shadow Form Slayer () (old) 12:53, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Only Requires votes though 12:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Silven Shadow () ( · · · · · )

See his talk page. Has literally never been constructive in the slightest, posts flame-worthy crap and defends himself by calling everybody scrubs. -- -

You may want to check, because I've actually been correct in every instance. The AB build was outdated, the ER build sucked and still does the 3rd time around. Actually check your history instead of just assuming. In the case of pvx, the majority is rarely correct, mainly because they're sheep. --Silven Shadow () 05:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, you'd be a great judge of your own correctness... Anyway, whether you were right or not is irrelevent here, as you were obviously not contributing to the discussions, but simply using personal attacks (which, by the way, is a bannable offense). If someone (from America) were to go around and say "FUCK JEWS AND MUSLIMS AND HINDIS THEY'RE ALL FAGS!!!11!1!" they might be "right" from a majority standpoint in that they're supporting the religion of the majority, but that doesn't make their opinions any more valid. -- -
Not the place to rant jai...-- 07:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Just one last thing before I stop clogging up the AN: I don't even necessarily have issue with Silven's standpoint on the builds he's "contributed" to, but simply how he goes about flaming trolling arguing stuff. If Silven can prove that most of his comments have actually been constructive (which doesn't include calling people sheep, scrubs, shit, etc.), then I'll eat my words. -- -
Jai was before me, but I too want to say he's highly annoying and is just being a big obstacle 14:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Jai was banned for commenting when he knew to stop (even being warned). Shadow was banned for commenting for no reason. Silven has been warned and I will keep an eye out and decide if further action is needed. 17:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Protected pages, autoban, some help

Hey Phen/Toraen/Fellow admins, I wanted to ask how it is possible I got an autoban (Other bans looked very different) and I get to see no "edit" button, because it says every page is "protected". 19:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

And now it has been fixed now I re-opened Chrome, sorry :S 19:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
autoban is when you're using an IP that is currently banned (and has autoban enabled). 19:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Never had that before though, that message 19:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Excluded () ( · · · · · )

Is massive, massive, massive drama a bannable offense? Because Minion's made months of it. If you want to ban me for essentially feeding him for so long, I wouldn't put up too much of a fight. -- -

Toraen is already following the discussion afaik. He would have taken action earlier if I had done anything wrong (or be told to stop). ~ 05:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Besides, pvx would be boring if excluded was gone, there'd be no drama to keep us interested! Roland () 05:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
This is the last warning any of you will ever get to not discuss stuff on this noticeboard. This is incredibly lenient considering two people were banned in the above section for this very thing. If you absolutely feel the need to comment on something on this noticeboard use the talk page. To clarify, it is inappropriate for Excluded to comment in a section specifically complaining about his behaviour and Roland's comment was one of the most useless I have ever seen on this noticeboard. Don't do it in future. People can consider this a blanket warning, I will simply ban in the future. 10:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Chieftain Alex () ( · · · · · )

Violation of and refusal to self revert . Discussion of which version is appropriate is pending on which version of the page is appropriate, but I have no intention of entering into a revert war. 12:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

I feel a ban is unneeded. Both parties were acting with , and all involved are now discussing the changes (and Ska has been warned by yourself). Unless the reverting continues, there's no need for intervention. 20:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

( · · · · · )

General NPA & unconstructive edits - All the edits appear to be a logged out user, you can ID him fairly easily with checkuser. And then to top it off, -- 07:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

That is my ip, was having issues logging in, also where's the NPA? When has it been against policy to inform admins of asshattery. I am however guilty of replacing the word "toe" with "penis". ApplesaucePancakes () 09:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I've warned the user in question. 10:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Quebra sites () ( · · · · · )

Hi enormous, once more 19:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Banned. For the record shadow, don't post on his talks or respond to him at all anymore. -- 19:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Character creation () ( · · · · · )

Obvious sock is v. obvious. Also, his other accounts are probably the other two new ones: and . 22:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

All are blocked for socking. -- 00:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Archived tested GvG builds

When hitting the "next 200" button on I get the url but I stay at the first page.

I assume this might be better off at another place but couldn't find it (curse noticeboard maybe?). So please move if appropriate. Steve1 () 11:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

It's already on curse noticeboard. It affects all categories with >200 members. -- 15:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Curse appear to have resolved this, it was working yesterday too but I forgot to comment. 08:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Rask ()

Countless NPA and poking at new members when told to stop harassing us by admin. Open racism with no attempt to hide what he thinks of Fianchetto and I and his conduct when rating the past few builds have been suspect to votebalancing. Sorry Toraen; I was already typing this when you banned him. 06:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Resolved, Rask banned for 1 week. -- 06:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

HerpDerp () ( · · · · · )

I'd like to make a remark that Herp is making unnecessary edits (under the sign of "Qwak") and does not listen to Phen. 22:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Shadow. Besides my past confrontations with him, he is acting below is intelligence. 22:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Blocked. Dunno what's gotten into everyone lately but seriously chill. -- 22:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

( · · · · · )

See . Quak aka minion/jerplerp evading ban. ♣ 18:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. 19:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

( · · · · · )

HerpDerp evading his ban. ♣ 19:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Not enough evidence for this, and there's no harmful edits from this IP. -- 19:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

( · · · · · )

See Quak evading ban. ♣ 05:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Rask () ( · · · · · )

Polar voting. User could do with learning to vote properly. (hey there 0, 1, 5) 12:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't see a specific problem with polar voting. He is at least being consistent, it's not really our job to define what an acceptable spread of votes is. If you wish to discuss this further feel free to hit me up on my talk page. 13:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

( · · · · · )

Weird text and removing things in my sandbox, probably the start of an annoying IP -- 13:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocked. -- 14:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Brandy mice () ( · · · · · )

and ( · · · · · ). It's an odd couple :S. -- 13:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Same person. Talked to them. 13:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Ban pl0x. ♣ 14:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes sir. 14:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

( · · · · · )

Obvious violation -- 16:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from ""