Talk: AuronFtw

Friday

19

April

05:10 UTC

Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Hi auron--TahiriVeila 16:17, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

zzz --Lemming 01:22, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Any reason why or is it just because you're friends with the 2 above? Angueo 22:38, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

There's only so much reasoned debate can achieve when one of the parties lacks experience. So far, you have been civil and have explained yourself very well, so I don't want to troll you or antagonize you, but basically, Lemming has played top 20 gvg for a few years now and when he says something is meta, it probably is.

If you want to theorycraft, that's fine. But the point of our PvP section is not to play around with what might work, it's to document what is working right now in the meta. You are free to list your own variations of builds and anything you like in your userspace, but we're trying to keep the signal to noise ratio in check at least in the GvG section.

Having read your userpage, it seems you're interested in helping necros out learning the game. You can write guides on basic necro strats (positioning, what to look out for in matches, who to hex in what situations, etc) and that would be a great help. But again, in the GvG section and specifically on the meta-tagged builds, we're trying to keep theorycrafting to a minimum - we just let the good players theorycraft and write down what they run. If they think OoB is a great idea, you'll start seeing it on obs. If you only saw it once on obs and everyone else is running a different bar, there's probably a reason for it.

I don't want to chase you away from the site, but I would prefer if you stopped arguing over that specific build until you grasp what our goal is with the section. -Auron 00:48, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Everything you just said should be policy, if it isnt already.--Oskar 23:54, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

It's called common sense.--Relyk _talk 00:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

shut up--Oskar 00:07, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

yeah shut up --Angelus... 19:18, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

This is once again another "Hey let's dis Relyk" chain. Disregarding Angelus, Oskar kind of has a "point", because common sense doesn't exist. People are stupid sheep. --DANDY ^_^ -- 19:48, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

"I don't want to chase you away from the site, but I would prefer if you stopped arguing over that specific build until you grasp what our goal is with the section." could have been done in friendlier ways. Angueo 20:24, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

That was a friendly way of putting it. Especially compared to just calling you a dipshit - which is what usually happens. Daññy 22:18, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

People usually phrase themselves "You're an idiot, shut up", which doesn't work :> --DANDY ^_^ -- 08:52, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

I would have liked to just tell you that I'm right and you're wrong. --Lemming 09:31, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

This is why you're such a horrible person Lem. --Crow 13:38, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

:( --Lemming 18:19, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Do you have the ability to view the email accounts of users?

If you do, then we need to talk on MSN. Karate Jesus 17:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

no. Viewing e-mails has to be either done server side (by looking at the user DB) or the wiki has to have a certain extension installed (can't think what it's called, but i know we don't have it). ~ PheNaxKian talk 18:00, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

[1]

oh sound.--Oskar 21:20, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Lolz. I actually do have his physical address and latitude and longitude. I have a list of who has lived there the last few years and his ISP provider. If anyone is interested, just email me. We can probably just sign him up for gay porn or something.

The best part? I have to be able to do background checks and trace IPs as a part of my job. I have a masked dynamic IP, so unless he's a fucking wizard, he won't be able to track me down. My IP address has visited 8 countries today, at the very least. Karate Jesus 22:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Btw, I'm glad he told me it was Lisbon (or Liboa, to be exact). I kept thinking "surely it's not this easy to track this fuckwad. He can't just be unplugging his modem". And I was wrong. He's that retarded. Every single one of his IPs gives me the exact same address on the exact same street. I even had a friend of mine who speaks Portuguese call his ISP to confirm his address.

If only we had his email..... Karate Jesus 22:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

I still have about 4 gigs of horse porn we dumped into my high school's network a few years back. You could start mailing it to him bit my bit or something i suppose.--TahiriVeila 22:42, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Why do you still have horse porn? XD! I'll email the hell out of him :> ¬ Docta Rask Jenkins 00:38, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

We put a keylogger on a couple of the PCs in the library and managed to accumulate a couple hundred usernames + passwords. So we just filled them with horse porn. Friend had it all, dunno where he got it or why he had it.--TahiriVeila 02:32, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

lol. "Friend had it all." I don't buy it for a second. ;o Daññy 05:10, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Your right man, i just love staring at horse cock :( --TahiriVeila 15:46, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I gave KJ a suggestion. This could have a rather epic ending. Daññy 01:38, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

If Danny's right, this will be rather hilarious. Karate Jesus 01:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

I hope you retards realize this enormous idiot is trolling the fucking shit out of all of you. I am displeased.

And don't try to give me that shit about "no we're just trolling him lolol hurrrr" because if you were any good at trolling you would simply have ignored him and he would be gone by now. The simple fact that you are going through so much effort on some idiot's behalf is just a sign of your massive butthurt. Every time he posts, revert and ban him. Also damn, none of this stupid "post from banned user removed" bullshit, just REVERT THE EDIT and leave nothing there. Aside from that, just ignore him. He's not even a good enough troll to have any real accounts left, I'm not sure why you guys are all ate up with this shit. Retarded 12 year olds can proxy. Ban him like a retarded 12 year old and leave it at that. -Auron 07:44, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

technically speaking, did you just accidentally get trolled by pvx getting trolled by some faggot? Daññy 08:50, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

IT'S A RECURSIVE TROLL WAR NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO--TahiriVeila 15:47, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

yes. -Auron 23:19, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Sometimes I eat pie while I troll. ¬ Docta Rask Jenkins 00:27, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

AN

Maybe protecting it so that IP's cant edit it would be good. They dont tend to be the ones to ask for vote removals etc.--Oskar 13:17, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

It hasn't really had excessive vandalism, just isolated spambots which were quickly reverted/banned, so I'd rather we didn't. ToraenTheJanitor 13:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

(EC)no, the AN needs to be accessible for everyone. ~ PheNaxKian talk 13:27, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Special:Block/Docta_Jenkins

It didn't really register with me yesterday, but considering (excluding the perma) that you were the last person to block him, and that he hadn't edited in that one day or so he was back before you perma'd him. Why exactly did you perma him when nothing had changed between now and a week ago when you blocked him? You seemed perfectly happy with the one week block before. Would it not be sufficient to say that if he does anything an Admin deems ban worthy, to perma him then instead? ~ PheNaxKian talk 15:57, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

No, I hadn't taken into account his past permablocks. If a user comes back from a perma (on a new account) and is an upstanding contributor, then okay, they can stay. If they come back from a perma, sock to evade a ban, then incur as many blocks as that user did, there is no benefit to the wiki in keeping them around. Permablock that user on sight from now on. He got his second chance and fucked it up. -Auron 02:38, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

All I have to add to this conversation is "lolpvx". Daññy 00:23, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Bumble's Secret Area

H-hi!! --Bumble 17:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Permaban

Would you do me the honor? --Jai. - 02:44, March 17 2011 (UTC)

You can't just... go away? This permaban nonsense is for idiots and drama queens. If you want to quit, quit. -Auron 05:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

self-control is a tough thing man. Readem 09:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

self-control is for quitters. =/ Danny 10:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Hey Auron! Thx for greetings! Fowler 12:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

What is this

Didn't even realize I got blocked lol :D. When was being autistic blockable? Anvil God_zzz... 02:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

zzz--TahiriVeila 03:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

1 day block was pretty generous--Relyk 05:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

So is a 1 foot cock. I doubt I'd want to have to take one of those from auron though. Rask 06:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I'd also like to say Auron, it seems you only come back to pvx when you feel like banning someone for being a doucher. To keep it short: If you're not going to do anything productive then stay away, banning the few active contributors we have isn't doing anyone any good. Rask 06:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

trolling auron's page isn't smart either--Relyk 07:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

So much irony. Anvil God_zzz... 16:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I have to harass him because no one else has the balls. Rask 22:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

correction: everyone else who has the balls just goes "lolpvx" and goes about their business. Danny 03:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Sup cutie <3 Rask 12:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Autism will always be a bannable offense, even if we have only 1 contributor. -Auron 15:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

If we banned people for autism, there will always be 0 contributors. Anvil God_zzz... 16:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Then there will be 0 contributors. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 21:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

There's contributors?--Relyk 22:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

User permissions

Did you change it so that new users can't create non-talk pages/upload files? I can understand why if you did (especially with that last vandal spree), but now 4 days wait seems like a bit too long for someone to wait in order to contribute beyond talk pages. Should we shorten that or not? I guess the evaluation period would allow us to separate potentially godawful users out before they become much of a problem though. -- Toraen talk 01:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

I didn't change anything :o -Auron 01:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

He's got his Auron face on. Anvil God_zzz... 01:29, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Well that's ominous. I guess it was Curse then, I don't think Phen would have done it before leaving without telling anyone. -- Toraen talk 01:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

23:30, 17 October 2011 Auron (Talk | contribs) blocked 83.240.216.99 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 month (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) ‎ (Trying to circumvent existing block)

Enormous hasn't been banned for like the last several months. He still trolls as much as ever, but every once in a while he finds something constructive to say. Did something change? --Jai. - 01:44, October 18 2011 (UTC)

I'm supporting this since his last edit was pointless banter thrown into an argument other people were having. I remember telling him specifically not to do that exact thing. He managed to be constructive on some builds which is pretty much the only thing that saved him earlier (I banned SFS instead around that time because he managed to somehow post less useful comments than enormous). -- Toraen talk 03:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

None of his constructive comments are productive because of the WoT rants he uses. It only serves to aggravate users.--Relyk 03:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Whenever I see a wall of text I'm like "oh, it must be enormous." I find out the one good point he makes by looking at the person who responds to him. --Jai. - 03:44, October 18 2011 (UTC)

People still read walls of text on this site?--TahiriVeila 04:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Nothing better to do. :/ --Jai. - 04:13, October 18 2011 (UTC)

I like enormous' wall of text :( He will be missed.Ӎiñon 04:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Can Minion haz banhammer too? :D --Jai. - 04:29, October 18 2011 (UTC)

ban all of pvx. problem solved. Danny 07:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

I like. --Jai. - 10:25, October 19 2011 (UTC)

Feedback

Hello! I want to thank you for everything you have done for the PvX Wiki. Allow me to introduce myself. I am Tesla, a wiki manager for Curse. The reason I am posting on your talk page is for some feedback. I was hoping you could tell me if there was something you would like to see on the wiki or if you think there is something we could do to help improve the quality of our service to the community. If you have any ideas at all, please feel free to stop by on my talk page and leave me your thoughts. Thank you! DjTesla 06:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

does curse just hire anyone these days? -Auron 00:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

QQ

Enormous really hasn't been trolling all that much lately. --Jai. - 05:21, December 15 2011 (UTC)

The edits don't have to be recent.--Relyk 05:25, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

But it said for trying to circumvent existing block..his last block ended a month ago, unless ofc he was referring to his enormous accounts or w/e but i thought phen moved past that and let him back? Roland 05:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Well, no one really specified whether he was perma'd or not when he was doing all of the proxy'ing. All of his IP's were banned for a month of two because permabanning them might have harmed someone other than Enormous. --Jai. - 06:00, December 15 2011 (UTC)

Well, he hasn't been trolling that much since his last ban. --Jai. - 06:00, December 15 2011 (UTC)

Nope, he hasn't. And he waited for the block to end after like 3 ip changes Shadow _{Christmas Signature} 06:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

He's been behaving. That's about all I can say on the matter. ApplesaucePancakes 07:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

<3 — Skakid Rally- kupo! 09:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

I am disappoint. ~Ӎiñon 12:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

I am Jack's overused meme. Danny 02:32, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

So close to breaking the first and second rule dannykins. ApplesaucePancakes 05:27, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

zzz, if he cared about the site he'd stay away from it. It's fairly obvious he's not wanted here, and his continued disregard for the rules as evidenced by his continued sockpuppeting outweighs any benefits there might be to allowing him to stick around. -Auron 13:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I do admit some benificial edits were not made by him. He didn't do something seriously wrong after the last ban yet. He obviously trolled his own talk page, but if he wants to screw his talk page and troll himself, so be it. Shadow _{Christmas Signature} 13:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

PvX isn't a chat forum, though. We are all here (well at least, supposed to be) to contribute and improve the wiki. The way we use user talk pages, considering that in most wikis they are used to talk about wiki related things, is really just a privilege not a right. I think the amount of non-related stuff over the years has only been tolerated because of the level of user contribution, which if he doesn't have then he shouldn't really get one (at least in my opinion). Saying that, I haven't contributed mainspace since i rejoined wiki, just build talks. So I can't really say anything. Rawr 13:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

If you kept a straight face while writing those first few sentences, hats off to you. Danny 06:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I guess the way that I see Enormous is kinda like one of my old cats: He was crazy no matter what you did, but when you tried to box him in he'd go apeshit fucking insane. We stopped trying to take him to the vet because trying to keep him (or in our case, the wiki) healthy wasn't worth the shitstorm that we'd cause if we tried to put him in a kennel. Lol, he was the only one of our cats with his balls intact. He eventually died of cancer and AIDs (which is probably going to be the wiki, but whatever). --Jai. - 15:02, December 20 2011 (UTC)

You took him to the vet just to find out he had cancer and AIDS? Danny 06:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)