Thanks for editing my typos. --Meowpeow 19:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
So there is no chance of this build getting vetted then...Like I said before I don't know how this works Just need to hear it from an Admin.Xtreme Hunter 02:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- So exactly as I predicted now you are going to emo rage pvx, right? --Anonimous. D: 00:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Is that my only choice? If so then let the rage begin....um...you first then?Xtreme Hunter 00:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Me? --Anonimous. D: 00:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- you are first one to mention it so you should be the first to go right? It's like the messenger....he always gets it....lol I am good. Just messing around. If they don't like my build I can't knock them for it. How many people knocked the original 55 monk before it became a common concept. No worries.Xtreme Hunter 00:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I see you chose path of QQ'ing because your build got trashed up until PvX'ers troll you well outta here. --Anonimous. D: 00:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I feel like I am in the Matrix....choose? It was my only option...and please tell me what the hell QQ means!!!Xtreme Hunter 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- LOL I know what QQ is now...I don't cry...I thought it ment talk about. Remeber I didn't know how this system works. I just learnt what WELL'd is....and QQ. This build being WELL'd is a mistake in my point of view but I don't call the shots so I accept my position. I will keep talking about this build cause I enjoy it. So trash away if you want....I am a man and I can take it....lolXtreme Hunter 02:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- You get +1 internets for that statement sir. It is truly an epic win.--ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 14:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sadly, you are under the impression that going on like a broken recorder deserves a +1. Good day to you.uɐɟɐʞıd 17:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Pika you seem to be under the mistaken impression that every user on this site gives a damn about what you say, This user was baited by an asshole and handled it without getting mad and raging, in fact his counter statement was so win that I gave him + 1 internets. So no you cannot revoke the internet I gave him for that strong dick deflection. Good day to you sir.--ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 21:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Shadowsin you seem to be under the mistaken impression that I care about any or every user on this site who do/does or do/does not give a damn about what I say. I don't really care about "revoking the internet" and I don't know how to "revoke the internet" either. Also learn how to make educated inferences, you know what happens when you ASSume. Good day to you dear sir.uɐɟɐʞıd 22:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Pika you seem to be under the mistaken impression that every user on this site gives a damn about what you say, This user was baited by an asshole and handled it without getting mad and raging, in fact his counter statement was so win that I gave him + 1 internets. So no you cannot revoke the internet I gave him for that strong dick deflection. Good day to you sir.--ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 21:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sadly, you are under the impression that going on like a broken recorder deserves a +1. Good day to you.uɐɟɐʞıd 17:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- You get +1 internets for that statement sir. It is truly an epic win.--ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 14:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- LOL I know what QQ is now...I don't cry...I thought it ment talk about. Remeber I didn't know how this system works. I just learnt what WELL'd is....and QQ. This build being WELL'd is a mistake in my point of view but I don't call the shots so I accept my position. I will keep talking about this build cause I enjoy it. So trash away if you want....I am a man and I can take it....lolXtreme Hunter 02:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I feel like I am in the Matrix....choose? It was my only option...and please tell me what the hell QQ means!!!Xtreme Hunter 00:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- I see you chose path of QQ'ing because your build got trashed up until PvX'ers troll you well outta here. --Anonimous. D: 00:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- you are first one to mention it so you should be the first to go right? It's like the messenger....he always gets it....lol I am good. Just messing around. If they don't like my build I can't knock them for it. How many people knocked the original 55 monk before it became a common concept. No worries.Xtreme Hunter 00:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Me? --Anonimous. D: 00:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Is that my only choice? If so then let the rage begin....um...you first then?Xtreme Hunter 00:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
So here it is....I am not sure what the difference is in builds? Build:Any/Me Ebon Totem Farmer is like and MM but not really. There are some similarities but not quite the same. They both rely on minions or summons to do the work. So what is the difference that warrnets a title "new build"? 10:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Sig[]
At the moment the pictures you are using in your sig are larger than 19px, and also, you can only use one picture in your sig, I have made this Screenshot version if you would like to use it instead:
FrostytheAdmin 14:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks...I thought it was alright as long as I used the same picture twice. 15:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, sorry. FrostytheAdmin 15:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- At the rate I am learning I might take over your job if you aren't careful....lol 15:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- The learning curve goes down in time. Also, becoming an admin isn't really predictable ;o ---Chaos- 15:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- At the rate I am learning I might take over your job if you aren't careful....lol 15:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope, sorry. FrostytheAdmin 15:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
For you sir[]
You are the strongest new user in quite some time. --Oj▲mo 19:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- ^.--ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 21:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Builds[]
I recommend you have a good read through the PvXwiki:Real Vetting article to get to terms wiht how builds are dealth with on the wiki. FrostytheAdmin 11:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Quotes[]
"whatever damage you do not take is whatever damage you don't have to heal, and thus you save energy and you have more energy to stay alive"Pikafan 17:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- In principle that is correct, by guardian'ing someone, they will take less damage, which means less damage for a healer to heal up, saving energy. FrostytheAdmin 17:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- I know I love it. That's why it is under my Quote section. I totally agree. That is why I developed my build that I posted that is in user space. That one line says it all. Great stuff. 18:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- That does NOT apply to infuse health. You must spam infuse health because it's strong.uɐɟɐʞıd 19:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I don't understand what do you mean by infuse health? 19:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Was more directed to frost, tbh.uɐɟɐʞıd 19:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Infuse Health heals a massive amount of hp, good for spikes, but it takes half your health, which goes against the Law of Healing. And pikafan is trying to be a smartass--Relyk 02:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Was more directed to frost, tbh.uɐɟɐʞıd 19:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I don't understand what do you mean by infuse health? 19:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- That does NOT apply to infuse health. You must spam infuse health because it's strong.uɐɟɐʞıd 19:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- I know I love it. That's why it is under my Quote section. I totally agree. That is why I developed my build that I posted that is in user space. That one line says it all. Great stuff. 18:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
hi[]
i like you, don't ask me why. you seem like a smart person:>Close Impact 17:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Why thank you. Vote on my new build then [[Build:Mo/R Holy Serpent Hands]] 18:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi[]
I really really hope you are a troll who is giving me excuses to ban people I don't like. Even if you aren't a troll you might give me an excuse to ban people I don't like anyway, so in short, keep being you. Thanks. Misery Says Moo 01:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Little confused here? Did you want me to continue my "rage"? If you do then I am sorry I won't. Sometimes taking a step back is needed. Also I know you don't like me so you don't have to repeat it. 12:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Misery basically says that because Build articles you post are silly ("CALL IT THE HUNTER!") and you defending these articles is annoying people rage at you and that gies Misery reason to ban those of them he simply doesn't like. (I assume it's he, lol) --Anonimous. D: 12:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You misunderstand me, I wasn't saying I dislike you at all and I'm not referring to specific actions, just your nature seems to raise people's hackles which makes them do stupid things. Misery Says Moo 13:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ahhh yes I did misunderstand you. Very good....As for anonimous think before you type. I was new...I didn't know how it worked so if that gives you a reason to go bash someone's head in then it isn't the build that is the problem but the people to respond to it. I did defend it well I might add. But of course you don't see that cause your mind is closed off and have a problem accepting something new. Learn and grow. 13:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You really dont know shit about me or my mind ok? So shut it. Even worse youre missing the point of what people are telling you entirely, I said same thing Misery did with more detailed exlanation of why people hate you so I suggest you re-read stuff several times before you comment. --Anonimous. D: 14:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- And you don't know me...I am "shutting" it. But thanks for the kind words. 15:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Furthermore I have apologized for my actions....have you? 15:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have apologized for your actions? wtf... --Anonimous. D: 22:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Anon has nothing to apologize for, and you have not apologized. --Oj▲mo 22:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- LOL re-read his comment. HE has apologized for MY actions. That was good. I have, didn't think you would be jumping on the bash band. That is fine. Anon is a little sharp...fine by me. 22:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- FYI see below 22:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- i dont see how calling someone a douchebag is relating to them --Oj▲mo 22:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was looking at his site and he was praising to be yourself even if you are an asshole. I wasn't comfortable saying that so I called him a douchebag. That is why I said it...I know now it was a mistake and I have expressed my misjudgement to KJ. I am confused here didn' you say "You are the strongest new user in quite some time"? I am human and I made a mistake I said I was sorry to KJ. Anon came out of nowhere and was like the 4th one "getting on my case". 22:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- i dont see how calling someone a douchebag is relating to them --Oj▲mo 22:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Dont put words in my mouth, I never apologized for your actions, why you think I should? --Anonimous. D: 00:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- FYI see below 22:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- LOL re-read his comment. HE has apologized for MY actions. That was good. I have, didn't think you would be jumping on the bash band. That is fine. Anon is a little sharp...fine by me. 22:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Furthermore I have apologized for my actions....have you? 15:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- And you don't know me...I am "shutting" it. But thanks for the kind words. 15:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You really dont know shit about me or my mind ok? So shut it. Even worse youre missing the point of what people are telling you entirely, I said same thing Misery did with more detailed exlanation of why people hate you so I suggest you re-read stuff several times before you comment. --Anonimous. D: 14:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ahhh yes I did misunderstand you. Very good....As for anonimous think before you type. I was new...I didn't know how it worked so if that gives you a reason to go bash someone's head in then it isn't the build that is the problem but the people to respond to it. I did defend it well I might add. But of course you don't see that cause your mind is closed off and have a problem accepting something new. Learn and grow. 13:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
This section has officially become retarded, so allow me to insert some reading comprehension. Xtreme said he has apologised for his own actions, then was asking if Anonimous had apologised for Anonimous' actions, implying that he should. Anonimous misinterpreted this as Xtreme suggesting Anonimous should apologise for Xtreme's actions and it spiraled into both of them having no idea what the other was talking about and generally making no sense. I sincerely hope one or both of you were just trolling. Have a nice day. Misery Says Moo 12:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
PvX:NPA[]
I suggest you read it, it applies to you also. I don't recommend calling people assholes, them calling you an asshole or douchebag first is not a valid defence. Misery Says Moo 12:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You are right...that wasn't me...just hard sometimes...funny thing is I don't swear much but I had enough. I tried to keep my composure but it got overwhelming last night. On my defence I was calling Karate a douchebag to try and relate to him....didn't work as I wanted. For that I am sorry. As for Relk...I meant what I said. 12:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- How is calling someone a douchebag trying to relate to someone? --IkimonoNeeds more "good" Paragon 03:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Any thing else to be said?[]
Kid you so white you make KJ look black. --Shazzydiddles 04:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nice, I am just across the 8th mile 10:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- being from detroit, noone calls it "the 8th mile"Xxunrealxx1 03:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I meant to say "the 80th mile". 10:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am black.................................................but seriously. Part Irish, German, Indian, Mexicans ftw! 15:47, 18 March 2009
- According to your sig I expected some Chinesse...lol 16:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- My sig looks chinese? 16:05, 18 March 2009
- He's confusing Chinese and Japanese. - 16:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- LOL yah I did. Kung Fu is Chinese. 16:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- NOooooo! I don't wanna look Wapanese...fuck. 16:21, 18 March 2009
- LOL yah I did. Kung Fu is Chinese. 16:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- He's confusing Chinese and Japanese. - 16:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- My sig looks chinese? 16:05, 18 March 2009
- According to your sig I expected some Chinesse...lol 16:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am black.................................................but seriously. Part Irish, German, Indian, Mexicans ftw! 15:47, 18 March 2009
- Sorry I meant to say "the 80th mile". 10:42, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- being from detroit, noone calls it "the 8th mile"Xxunrealxx1 03:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
If you are for real[]
/wrists--Relyk 06:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Real as can be....I can send you $2 so you can get a proper knife. 17:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Proper knives only cost $2? I think we have different definitions of the word "proper" 17:20, 16 March 2009
- the rustiest jagged knife money can buy....yah proper. 17:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
No i would buy the biggest, shiniest, most beautiful knife i could find, i want the scene to be beautifulRusty is good--Relyk 17:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)- Sounds like its time to dig the old Ogre Slaying knife out of storage lol Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 15:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- what are u all on about? >_> Hydra 17:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds like its time to dig the old Ogre Slaying knife out of storage lol Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 15:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- the rustiest jagged knife money can buy....yah proper. 17:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Proper knives only cost $2? I think we have different definitions of the word "proper" 17:20, 16 March 2009
You, Mr Xtreme, are my new favourite user on PvX, sorry KJ he just took your place! (PS Try ASDA Smart Price for a $1 knife) 86.132.208.180 15:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Your General Chat comment[]
Hi I saw your comment on the main chat page... sorry to hear you feel like on PvX "its not what you know but who you know." I personally have noticed a lot of 16 year old arogant asshats running around PvX without much policing, so I feel your pain. Still, keep up the contribs, and when you make a build, let me know so we can try and discuss it before the trolls show up. -- Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 01:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Lol....I have 2 main builds that I fall back to. They are on my main page. Please comment honestly even if you think they are garbage make sure there is a good reason is all I ask. 02:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hehe I'll promise more than the average PvX user seems capable of delivering: that I will strive to make any rating/comment I submit based on the defined criterion of effectiveness and universality as well as some actual reason and thought. Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 15:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope it's who you know. 17:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- There's a unfortunate truth in what you're saying it seems. Even if people don't follow the guidelines for ratings/well tags/general comments, you have to somehow gain the support of an admin/BM to see much done about it. So in that respect there is a sort of "who you know" going on around here. How to solve that? Meet more people I guess. Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 18:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Gaining credibility helps. And if you post a meta build, it wont get voted down. If you theorycraft....you have a 90% chance of getting voted down, even if you're Jesus himself. 18:53, 25 March 2009
- The assumption that new users/anons' builds will be bad comes from the fact that 90% of new builds anons and new users post are terrible, whereas most experienced PvXers (the ones people listen to, anyway), post meta, working builds. -- Star of Exile talk 18:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Exactly "Assumption"!!!! Not bitching just proving the point that new users have a bias to work agaisnt and then eventually get hounded til the /rage quit....SO the community is in fact the "experienced" PvX'ers....which proves it is "who you know not what you know" in order to get "meta" builds.....nah not meta but "any" build posted. Just my two cents. 22:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Tbh, coming to PvX and just assuming that everyone is going to agree with what you say is asinine. People aren't going to trust what you do or say until they think you're credible. That goes for PvX, GW, and rl. 22:15, 25 March 2009
- That is the problem not a solution. He is new is not a viable argument for something that works or not. You are part of the problem of "who you know" and even try a removed rates that I find good....cause I am new...that sir is asinine. You should stop saying words that you clearly don't understand...just a recommendation comming from a new guy...but what do I know I am new. Oh and I know I have bad spelling so don't even bother talking about that KJ 22:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I wont mention that you have bad spelling, but could you please re-type that statement well enough for me to understand it? I can barely understand what you're saying (also, lol at the irony of telling me that I don't know what a word means when you can't type). 22:27, 25 March 2009
- That is the problem not a solution. He is new is not a viable argument for something that works or not. You are part of the problem of "who you know" and even try a removed rates that I find good....cause I am new...that sir is asinine. You should stop saying words that you clearly don't understand...just a recommendation comming from a new guy...but what do I know I am new. Oh and I know I have bad spelling so don't even bother talking about that KJ 22:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Tbh, coming to PvX and just assuming that everyone is going to agree with what you say is asinine. People aren't going to trust what you do or say until they think you're credible. That goes for PvX, GW, and rl. 22:15, 25 March 2009
- Exactly "Assumption"!!!! Not bitching just proving the point that new users have a bias to work agaisnt and then eventually get hounded til the /rage quit....SO the community is in fact the "experienced" PvX'ers....which proves it is "who you know not what you know" in order to get "meta" builds.....nah not meta but "any" build posted. Just my two cents. 22:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- The assumption that new users/anons' builds will be bad comes from the fact that 90% of new builds anons and new users post are terrible, whereas most experienced PvXers (the ones people listen to, anyway), post meta, working builds. -- Star of Exile talk 18:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Gaining credibility helps. And if you post a meta build, it wont get voted down. If you theorycraft....you have a 90% chance of getting voted down, even if you're Jesus himself. 18:53, 25 March 2009
- There's a unfortunate truth in what you're saying it seems. Even if people don't follow the guidelines for ratings/well tags/general comments, you have to somehow gain the support of an admin/BM to see much done about it. So in that respect there is a sort of "who you know" going on around here. How to solve that? Meet more people I guess. Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 18:29, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nope it's who you know. 17:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hehe I'll promise more than the average PvX user seems capable of delivering: that I will strive to make any rating/comment I submit based on the defined criterion of effectiveness and universality as well as some actual reason and thought. Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 15:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
There are no experienced PvXers, they are all terrible at Guild Wars, true story. Misery Says Moo 23:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- ^ it's true. I know that I suck. 01:50, 26 March 2009
- fo, fo fo fo Tab 13:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Main authors cannot remove WELL tag[]
build tag removed
Do not remove this tag from builds you authored unless a consensus has been reached on the talk page. Consensus hasn't been reached, so don't remove from your build. WELL tag just means it's up for debate to be deleted, not must be deleted. 21:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry[]
If my comments offended you. If your friend killed himself and you watched him at the hospital, i can understand that. But its offensive to me that you would say "Real as can be....I can send you $2 so you can get a proper knife." when something like that obviously impacted you. And if you hadn't noticed my comment on your 145hp monk, you can add a section to the Guide:Invinci-Monk Guide involving invincibility using shielding hands.--Relyk 07:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Very mature, Relyk. You win 10 internets. ~ Big sysop 08:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- WOW (not World Of Warcaft...lol) never thought I would see the day...hats off to you sir. My point was (also being upset) watch what you say and to who for it can do more damage then you think. 14:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well being a hypocrite doesn't really get the point through then--Relyk 15:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Everyone is a hypocrite on the interwebz. 17:11, 23 March 2009
- One can get derailed pretty quick around here....just my 2 cents. 18:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- People derail on purpose, its called trolling--Relyk 02:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- One can get derailed pretty quick around here....just my 2 cents. 18:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Everyone is a hypocrite on the interwebz. 17:11, 23 March 2009
- Well being a hypocrite doesn't really get the point through then--Relyk 15:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- WOW (not World Of Warcaft...lol) never thought I would see the day...hats off to you sir. My point was (also being upset) watch what you say and to who for it can do more damage then you think. 14:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
FEATHERS[]
Where is the best place to get feathers? 11:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nahpui Quarter, Avicara. Why in caps? --Anonimous. D: 12:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Looks better...thanks. Griffons weren't given up enough. 13:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Avicara do they have better feather drops in HM? 13:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- I believe drop rates in NM and HM are equal. I'm not sure though. Brandnew. 13:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- I played both modes and I think you are right...I thought HM is suppose to give better drops? 13:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- HM doesn't effect crafting material drop rate I think. --Anonimous. D: 13:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- I played both modes and I think you are right...I thought HM is suppose to give better drops? 13:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- I believe drop rates in NM and HM are equal. I'm not sure though. Brandnew. 13:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Avicara do they have better feather drops in HM? 13:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Looks better...thanks. Griffons weren't given up enough. 13:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- No. And I defo notice a difference in gold drops. Try finding a gold in Ascalon on NM :< --- -- (contribs) (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
[[Build:M/R Infused Resilience]][]
was moved to [[Build:Mo/R Infused Resilience]] due to PvX:NAME. Spaggage talk 21:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't get it[]
How is it that everything you've ever said on this wiki is pure, concentrated retardation? How can you be, in terms of brain damage, only a handful of leagues from the legendary Mizzouman? —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 17:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Your first words to me are so kind...not what I expected from an ex-admin. 18:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Aptitude not Attitude[]
I am will to buy if anyone is selling 19:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC) Crap I meant "Let Memory Live Again" 20:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
User:Xtreme1ne/Build:Mo/any 145hp SoJ/PI[]
Try to discuss the build only so you don't get into any more arguments whenever someone posts criticism. Seeing as the 145hp monk concept is now in the 55 monk guide, there's no reason to argue over its viability :)--Relyk 02:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Shut the fuck up[]
^ skakid9090 15:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
...[]
Don't get so defensive. You are getting way to pissy and upset over internet insults by people pushing your buttons. I may be sounding "mean", but I'm serious: man up and shrug off insults as opposed to getting all pissy and having a temper tantrum whenever anyone says "shut the fuck up." It's called the internet. I've had stuff said to me MUCH worse than shut the fuck up (which isn't even an insult, it's advice). So stop being overly sensitive and ignore dumb comments. --☭Guild*talk* 21:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- It has been constant since I got here....and you know that. Everybody has there limits...give me a break. Also I was able to undo Tab erase BWT. I am just shocked is all. This is a video game for crying out loud....too many nerds getting beat up and take it out here. 21:57, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- This drama is going to end up with a lulz suicide. 21:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- LOL 22:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Rule 20: Nothing is to be taken seriously. --Oj▲mo 15:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- rule 34: There is porn of it, no exceptions.... well wheres my pvx porn? I'm waiting!----ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 20:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's out....called Debbie dose PVXXX 20:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- rule 34 nubfaic --Oj▲mo 20:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- rule 34: There is porn of it, no exceptions.... well wheres my pvx porn? I'm waiting!----ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 20:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Rule 20: Nothing is to be taken seriously. --Oj▲mo 15:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- LOL 22:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- This drama is going to end up with a lulz suicide. 21:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey vandals[]
You're still doin' it wrong. Even with a 30 mb page I was still able to manually revert. Try using mass images or something. ··· Danny Does Drugs 04:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Stop typing[]
Every time you voice your opinion, your stupid starts showing. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 16:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- Umm....okay cause you said so. 16:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- He's speaking for all of us. ··· Danny Does Drugs 17:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)