This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Due to high volume of blocks, this user isn't allowed to edit 32 seconds after block is completed.
Readem syndrome? ---Chaos- (talk) -- 11:04, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- lol----X 11:20, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
There's a difference between spelling mistakes and typos tbh. --Frosty 16:01, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- I am aware but others aren't and always assume that I can't spell....Life included. Most of my mistakes are rather taken out of context or typos....imo--X 16:34, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Then you are retarded for typo'ing approximately 17 times per sentence. :) Thomas So Dutch 16:39, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- My typos are from typing quickly, not from having epic fail grammar. Life Guardian 16:43, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Meh just too lazy to load spell check tbh....@ Life /fail--X 17:52, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Linking again because I can. ··· Danny Pew Pew 18:14, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- lol thanks--X 19:19, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Linking again because I can. ··· Danny Pew Pew 18:14, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Meh just too lazy to load spell check tbh....@ Life /fail--X 17:52, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
There is no need to be
Quite so patronising to new users.----~Short~ 18:27, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
- Holy you totally took it wrong. His builds are crap and I was being nice.----X 18:28, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
Let me rephrase Short's initial statement: Stop patronizing new users. You are bad and are in absolutely no position to be calling anyone's builds crap. <3 ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:40, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Also, stop being a fucking policy whore faggot, you were cool for a little while but lately you've just been a nigger. Thunda 20:50, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Don't be like that Thunda...you were harsh on that kid. As for Danny I am in position don't know what crawled up your ass----X 23:10, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
x, look, the first time you posted you build on pvx it went all wrong and bad and you were getting flamed at. i was defending your arse like fuck. you didnt like that didnt you? now your actually doing the same as the others did too you Terran 23:30, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
- just keep it cool Terran 23:31, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
- Link please----X 16:36, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Yes you did...and I am...what they are reffering to is Thunda flamed a new user and I agreed on the ban he got. Danny? I am not sure what his case is.
- As for thouse builds, I said Barrage was better, as we all know, yet he wants to go on about it so I tired to get Master Elros to stop where he made things worse. I am trying to help these new users along like what you did to me----X 00:55, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
I was just pointing out that, while you may no longer be "bad" depending on who you talk to, you are not "good" and therefore do not have a valid opinion yet. That doesn't mean I have anything against you, by any means. I'm just stating the obvious. ··· Danny Pew Pew 01:03, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
- Well keep that to yourself and what is the common saying here?....yah gtfo----X 01:39, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
Char Mask
Got lucky----X 19:32, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
Turret Ranger
Re: [[Build:R/any Marksman's Turret]]. I have greatly expanded the build page to properly show the usage, effectiveness, and some variations of the build. Also, there are new contributions on the talk page from rangers with extensive experience using the build. I would very much appreciate it if you would reevaluate the build based on the expanded comments and your own testing, and then re-rate the build. Please note, that this build is not meant to replace Barrage. There are many vanquishes, quests, missions, and teams where Barrage is not very effective; in most of those cases, a variation Marksman's Turret works wonderfully. I understand the build does not immediately look like much at first glance, because most of my ranger friends have been very skeptical as I introduced it to them over the course of the last year. But, it's a major tool in the ranger arsenal for each one of them now, and I just want to share it with a wider audience. Thanks for your time.--ClavisRa 21:13, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
- I did change it and for the time being I will keep it that way...I need to try it in different areas----X 23:11, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
What ISP are you with?
Respond on my Talk page plz and thank you! --Frosty 19:08, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- What IP address is it saying when you're blocked? Angela (talk) 21:26, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- All I can find now is the block log #'s....will that do? #7193 and #7195. I will look for the IP----X 21:38, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Current IP is 99.236.148.102----X 21:42, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Not IP, ISP. What company provides your internet access?--TahiriVeila 21:43, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- If you had a problem on October 9th, that was because of the server problem I mentioned on my talk page. But 99.236.148.102 is a rogers IP address, so the problem is just that you share an IP with a vandal. You can probably reset your IP by rebooting your modem and hope that the next one you get hasn't been blocked here. Another option is for admins to only block unregistered users if the IP was not being used by a logged in vandal so that you're not affected. Angela (talk) 21:45, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Tahiri...I will try and remember that for next time...damn----X 21:47, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- I could always proxy...like I said annoying. Is there a way one can block a certain IP but allow other users access when they use that IP?----X 21:50, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Actually Angela, the problem is occuring when we block a registered user with autoblock enabled. It occurs when we block a large range of people (Chaos Messenger, Thunda, Mafaraxas, Danny are people from the top of my head, Xtreme might remember better). When they get blocked, Xtreme gets blocked too. Interestingly, they don't all get interblocked, only Xtreme does. Misery Says Moo 22:12, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Obaby, charge your lazers guys. Thunda 22:25, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- I can unblock him without unblocking you ^^ Misery Says Moo 22:56, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Obaby, charge your lazers guys. Thunda 22:25, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
are you
banned? ~ PheNaxKian talk 15:38, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Nope...did you block Chaos?----X 16:14, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Try Pianc cause iirc that was the first time it happened. --Frosty 16:31, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
K
Deleting all the perma builds and putting them into the perma sliver form isn't going to work. Page will be too long and too difficult to manage. Leave them as they are. Life Guardian 01:44, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- How difficult is it to click on the side to go to the title you want on a page?----X 02:04, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- ALSO can't we just have links to dungeon guide for that build? If the page will be to long----X 02:12, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- I just don't see whats wrong with leaving them as they are. Life Guardian 02:29, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- He's biased against perma's and wants as many as possible to die. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 09:29, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- It's the same build with different suggestions on how to do it in different places. I thought this site was about keeping different builds....not the same one used differently? I will clean it up when I have time and not touch the main pages...if it is acceptable then we can just move the page. Hell I will let an admin move the page.----X 11:03, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Perma Sliver So how about this. Cleans it up and makes it clear.----X 11:50, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, each page often has maps and detailed descriptions of the particular usages. You lose tons of info if you put them under one page. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 12:03, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Oreally, check the dungeon link again....each one has it's own sub-page with all that info.----X 12:25, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't even check it for starters :> If it's smooth, we could just have 1 perma and 600/smite article with subpages for each area. Would be very smooth. The listing on the build page can get ugly, someone brainstorm this into a good idea. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 13:25, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- I think the different builds should be just that different. Anything pertaining to a build should be subpaged...imo. Haven't even looked at 600 yet. I do think it is more organized (smooth).----X 16:01, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't even check it for starters :> If it's smooth, we could just have 1 perma and 600/smite article with subpages for each area. Would be very smooth. The listing on the build page can get ugly, someone brainstorm this into a good idea. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 13:25, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Oreally, check the dungeon link again....each one has it's own sub-page with all that info.----X 12:25, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Well, each page often has maps and detailed descriptions of the particular usages. You lose tons of info if you put them under one page. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 12:03, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- He's biased against perma's and wants as many as possible to die. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 09:29, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
- I just don't see whats wrong with leaving them as they are. Life Guardian 02:29, November 19, 2009 (UTC)
[1] I'm not in the mood, so I'll just say you're an idiot. Nothing even links there. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 13:44, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
- And see Rogue's page. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 13:47, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
- There's precedent for linking back to the build page like that, so I'd let that go. ToraenTheJanitor 14:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Whenever you definitely want to archive another user's page, you can archive Tipttt's :> ---Chaos- (talk) -- 19:20, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
- lol I saw you already move the page....just finished it off----X 19:34, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Stop
spelling "flamed" as "flammed". Either you've forgotten the consonant rule or you think it's cool to use the old English long-s, which it isn't. ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:34, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
- did you get what I was saying? No...yes...I don't care if you don't like it...deal with it----X 21:46, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
- Danny is just being hostile because he doesn't care about the interwebz. He obviously means well (lol), but I admit, spelling it as "flammed" disturbs me too. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 21:47, December 6, 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I have a question...
I'm assuming you live in Canada, but that leaves me with a problem. You said you don't use a proxy, but one of the IPs you regularly used is from the middle of the U.S. and has been used by 6-7 other users, which means it's probably a proxy. My guess would be that that's why you're getting blocked, but I will still look into it more. Karate Jesus 16:44, 9 December 2009
- Yes Canada. Yes I don't use proxy. When I get home I will place my IP in the block page I have created----X 16:48, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- I saw that. Have you never proxied before? Not ever? Because according to checkuser, one of your IPs has been used by Gringo, Woho, Brandnew, etc. Lot's of people tends to indicate a common proxy IP address, unless you just happen to be the address their proxying (highly unlikely), then you must have proxied at some time.
- If you've used a proxy, that would explain why every time they get blocked, you're getting blocked too and it would have an easy solution. Karate Jesus 16:53, 9 December 2009
- tbh I have proxied with a 3rd party site before to bypass a block I had. However that was long ago and it was only once. I don't proxy anymore.----X 17:04, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Ok...that may be the problem. Did you ever attempt to sign in when using that proxy? Karate Jesus 17:07, 9 December 2009
- It was a random site...list of many...so no I never tired. It would be hard to find that site too...can I have that IP removed from my account?----X 17:40, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- That's what I'm trying to figure out. I'm not even sure if that's the issue yet. Give me a few hours to figure it out. Karate Jesus 17:41, 9 December 2009
- It was a random site...list of many...so no I never tired. It would be hard to find that site too...can I have that IP removed from my account?----X 17:40, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Ok...that may be the problem. Did you ever attempt to sign in when using that proxy? Karate Jesus 17:07, 9 December 2009
- tbh I have proxied with a 3rd party site before to bypass a block I had. However that was long ago and it was only once. I don't proxy anymore.----X 17:04, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I contacted wikia and they're trying to figure out the problem now. The weird thing is that Brandnew has never used the same IP as you. If they can't figure it out, they suggested that you just make a new account. So, give me a day or so to hear back and then we'll go on from there. Hopefully, we'll figure out something that can fix this. Karate Jesus 20:36, 9 December 2009
- thanks....why r u going the extra mile to help....me of all ppl?----X 20:38, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Meh, I'd do the same for anyone else tbh. Karate Jesus 20:39, 9 December 2009
- You haven't been very retarded lately. KJ has the same problem as me, he helps people even if he hates them, I'd guess. ---ChaosClause - 20:40, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- None of us really dislike you. It's just that you do retarded things sometimes and we have to call you out on it. We like you the rest of the time. ^_^ ··· Danny Hates Snow 21:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- So confused----X 22:55, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- hey X. I'm going to block you for a min. let me know when an ok time to do so (so i don'ty block you mid edit), and after i've blocked you, try and get on (through you're IP), so it says you're blocked because you're using an IP you're account's used. I'll unblock you after 5/10 mins, or if i see something pop up in the log saying "IP used by X, blocked for:blar" or whatever. It's just an idea i have that might sort the problem out. ~ PheNaxKian talk 23:19, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
- In short: You have some terrible brainfarts, but for the rest of the time you're actually tolerable. Consider that a compliment ;o ---ChaosClause - 10:44, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- So confused----X 22:55, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Before you think you are onto something KJ, 199.102.47.72 <- the IP that was edited by like 11 Users is not a proxy and was a wikia server that for some reason multiple users were apparently editing through, nothing userside purely wikiaside, so that isn't the problem. --Frosty 11:28, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Phen I can edit again----X 12:27, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- that's because i unblocked you. If you get a random block again let me know. ~ PheNaxKian talk 12:29, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- K will do....better start blocking users....try Danny, KJ Or Frosty----X 12:35, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- If you wanna try blocking me, I'll be gone pretty much the rest of today and friday so it won't bother me. and if i really, really need to make an edit i can just proxy. :> ··· Danny Hates Snow 19:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- why am i blocking these people? Have they been randomly blocked as well? >.> ~ PheNaxKian talk 20:00, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Because X randomly get blocked when random other people get blocked, I remember it happening with Panic, I doubt it has happened with me (because I am never blocked D:) though. --Frosty 20:28, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- ^ also I know they have used a proxy...and well Frosty cause he never gets banned..lol----X 22:33, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- why am i blocking these people? Have they been randomly blocked as well? >.> ~ PheNaxKian talk 20:00, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- If you wanna try blocking me, I'll be gone pretty much the rest of today and friday so it won't bother me. and if i really, really need to make an edit i can just proxy. :> ··· Danny Hates Snow 19:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- K will do....better start blocking users....try Danny, KJ Or Frosty----X 12:35, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
- that's because i unblocked you. If you get a random block again let me know. ~ PheNaxKian talk 12:29, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
tbh, it has to do with the wikia server thing. x must've made quite a few edits from it. so that has to either be scrubbed from his account or he'll have to make a new one. ··· Danny Hates Snow 23:45, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- that was an option but why only my account? Many users were making edits not just me....so why my account and only my account?----X 01:42, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
- it only blocks ips if you make several edits, so i'm assuming you must've made more than everyone else while that was happening. ··· Danny Hates Snow 04:14, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe this is a sign. — 04:21, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Blessing in disguise----X 11:07, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe this is a sign. — 04:21, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
Did we figure anything out with this yet? I still haven't heard back from wikia, but they keep saying that they're looking into it :/ KarateJesus 16:42, 11 December 2009
- Nope still fucked up.----X 17:06, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll give it one more day. If I haven't heard back by then, I'll try to find another solution (possibly you making a new account). KarateJesus 17:11, 11 December 2009
- Very good Mr. KJ sir----X 19:18, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Or should I say Mr. Ferguson ;)----X 19:21, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
- I must have missed that reference.... KarateJesus 19:23, 11 December 2009
- Ok, I'll give it one more day. If I haven't heard back by then, I'll try to find another solution (possibly you making a new account). KarateJesus 17:11, 11 December 2009
Did you get blocked....
When Tipttt first got banned? KarateJesus 19:27, 11 December 2009
Fix'd
" Hi,
We think that we have tracked down the bug responsible for this, and this shouldn't happen again. If it does, please let us know and we will investigate further.
- Wikia"
- Should be fixed now. Let me know if it happens again. KarateJesus 02:12, 12 December 2009
- GREAT thanks....so what was it?----X 14:09, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh and I lol'd at "We think "----X 14:10, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
- It's just taking into account the risk of the problem not being fixed. ---ChaosClause - 16:26, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
- I think it means that they did something...but they don't know what it does. That statement signafies "trial and error"----X 16:33, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
- They fucked up an IP port or something. Tbh, I'm not entirely sure. KarateJesus 20:10, 12 December 2009
- It's just taking into account the risk of the problem not being fixed. ---ChaosClause - 16:26, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
[2] He was being polite. Only hate on Saint when he deserves it, peace is so much fun. ---Chaos- (talk) -- 21:08, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
- meh I still agree----X 21:11, December 13, 2009 (UTC)
Dear X
Why have you annoyed me so much lately? :<
Sincerely,
---Chaos- (moo) -- 14:03, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Not intended...sorry....just give up it is easier----X 14:29, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- I actually like X more lately. I can understand his contributions, which always makes me like him more. KarateJesus 15:32, 21 December 2009
- I've always understood them, but he's not always "the brightest melon in the field" (sorry, X, but I can be blunt), but it's probably just because he hasn't been around very much. ---Chaos- (moo) -- 15:45, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- no prob I don't mind you being blunt AND wrong----X 16:59, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- I've always understood them, but he's not always "the brightest melon in the field" (sorry, X, but I can be blunt), but it's probably just because he hasn't been around very much. ---Chaos- (moo) -- 15:45, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- funny how adminship changes ones perspective. You are also getting less annoying----X 17:04, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
Big Gift
What is everyones big gift this year?--X mas Merry 11:03, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
- I've saved for a couple of months, and going to buy a computer with the help of my parents <3 I assume that'll be the big present of mine. ---Chaos- (moo) -- 11:31, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
- Nice....big 32" LCD screen with surround sound speakers? Alienware? $1000 video card with HDMI VIVO? 2 Terabyte HD with 8Gig of Ram? True 64 bit processing motherboard with sata RAID? $200
GamingBluetooth keyboard and mouse? Blueray burner? Excuse me I have to go to the bathroom.--X mas Merry 12:09, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
- Nice....big 32" LCD screen with surround sound speakers? Alienware? $1000 video card with HDMI VIVO? 2 Terabyte HD with 8Gig of Ram? True 64 bit processing motherboard with sata RAID? $200
Zzzz
my sig broken again or was that something else? ---Chaos- (moo) -- 21:27, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
- yep your sig...you contributed all over the place--X mas Merry 22:18, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
- --'''<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;">[[User:Chaos|<font color="deeppink">-Chaos-]] ([[User_talk:Chaos|moo]]) </font></span>'''-- 21:27, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure there isn't more than 1 span to close? ---Chaos- (moo) -- 22:21, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and somewhy your recent edits have amused me a shitton. Keep up with that <3 ---Chaos- (moo) -- 22:22, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
The
-'s in front of your signature are exponentially replicating. ---Chaos- (moo) -- 23:01, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Is it annoying?------X 02:12, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
- If you really wanted to do that right, you would've replied in morse code. If you really wanted to troll a certain dear admin of ours AND chaos at the same time, you'd change your sig to morse code. ··· Danny So Cute 04:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- It actually just means that you failed at copypasting your old signature. ---Chaos- (moo) -- 09:21, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Meh---..- - .-. . -- . 15:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
hey, i dont mean to sound like a whiny bitch, but on frosty's rfbm i would appreciate it if you could give a reason, simply because a support vote means a lot more if it has a reason, and frosty might need all the support he can get. gracias senor. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gringo (talk • contribs) (UTC). 17:28, January 21, 2010 (UTC)